Class of 10/16

We deviated from our usual studies involving technology, and instead focused on art in general.
The primary focus was the artist Man Ray from the early 20th century. We watched a documentary which explained some of the artist's philosophies and life. What I found especially notable in Man Ray's dialogue was that he was very absolute in his speech. This is notable because I think its ironic that a man who tried so hard to break away from normal conventions and show that nothing is necessarily what it seems, would speak in such a definitive, black or white way.

The professor passed around a book that showcased Man Ray's art. Its hard for me to call some of his "objects" art, despite being an artist myself. Though I know there is no one true definition for art, I believe art at the very least should be something that not everyone can do either in technique or concept. I just don't think pieces like his Lampshade have enough of a significant concept to be labeled art. However his more complicated and interesting sculptures were very nice. His photography peaked my interest more than anything. I know old-school photography was very hard and his prints were very masterful. One thing that did catch my eye was his photos from his Mr. and Mrs. Woodsman collection. These photos feature small wooden art figures in various sexual positions. I think its intriguing though a bit unfair, that those photos are considered art but if a teenager tried doing that same thing today, he would be labeled immature and not artistic. The collection reminds me of a scene in Team America where the main characters (who are puppets) engage in many of the same positions that the Woodsmans were in. I wonder if Matt Parker and Trey Stone were satirizing Man Ray or simply came up with the same idea. Either way it proves my point that someone trying to replicate Man Ray's photos in today's world would not be considered artists. i just think thats unfair.